Talk to Sales
Use Cases

How Organizations
Deploy Our Solutions

Real-world applications of Mitigate, Opiris, Engage, and Active Guard across regulated industries.

By the time ransomware is obvious, encryption has already started. Traditional tools alert too late and manual response is too slow to limit damage. Common gaps:

  • No early behavioral detection before encryption begins
  • Slow manual triage and isolation decisions
  • Lack of visibility across endpoints, servers, and cloud
  • No automated containment to stop lateral spread
  • Multi-week recovery timelines and EMR/system downtime

Correlates signals across the environment to detect ransomware before encryption completes:

  • Endpoint telemetry & file system behavior
  • Network traffic anomalies & C2 callbacks
  • Process trees & privilege escalation events
  • Lateral movement indicators & shadow copy deletion
  • Automated isolation policies per severity threshold
Contains attacks in minutes
Reduces blast radius
Protects critical systems
Avoids multi-week downtime
Lowers remediation cost
Reduces cyber insurance claims

Answers: "What is happening, what is affected, and what do we do right now?"

  • Attack timeline reconstruction
  • Affected asset inventory
  • Propagation path map
  • Automated isolation confirmation
  • Incident response step-by-step guide
  • Executive breach summary

Mitigate AI says:

"Ransomware-style behavior detected on DESKTOP-04 at 11:42 PM. File encryption activity began 7 minutes ago. The system has been automatically quarantined. Three other endpoints show similar pre-encryption indicators."

Attackers and malicious insiders move quietly using legitimate credentials. They blend into normal activity until significant damage is done. Common gaps:

  • No behavioral baseline for users and systems
  • Credential reuse and privilege abuse go undetected
  • Cross-department access anomalies missed
  • Long dwell times before detection
  • No way to distinguish compromised accounts from normal use

Establishes behavioral baselines and detects deviation across identity and network layers:

  • User & entity behavioral analytics (UEBA)
  • Authentication logs & access patterns
  • Privilege escalation & sensitive resource access
  • Lateral movement paths & unusual system traversal
  • Off-hours activity & volume anomalies
Reduces attacker dwell time
Detects insider threats
Stops credential abuse
Protects sensitive data
Reduces breach scope
Supports forensic investigation

Answers: "Is this user's behavior consistent with their role and history?"

  • Anomaly score with context
  • Peer group comparison
  • Access path visualization
  • Risk timeline per user
  • Recommended investigation steps
  • Escalation recommendation

Mitigate AI says:

"User jsmith accessed 47 systems in the past 6 hours — 9x above their 30-day baseline. Three systems are outside their normal department scope, including one privileged server with no prior access history."

SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 audits require evidence collection, control documentation, and policy verification — mostly assembled manually right before audits. Common issues:

  • Evidence scattered across dozens of systems
  • Manual screenshots and log exports
  • Control gaps discovered during audit, not before
  • Repeat findings across audit cycles
  • No real-time compliance posture visibility

Continuously monitors and captures audit evidence across all major frameworks:

  • Control monitoring mapped to SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST
  • Automated evidence collection & log retention
  • Policy enforcement verification
  • Access review & change management tracking
  • Always-ready evidence packages per framework
Eliminates manual audit prep
Passes audits first attempt
Reduces auditor findings
Cuts compliance staff burden
Real-time posture visibility
Supports multi-framework audits

Answers: "What is our current compliance posture, and what needs attention before the audit?"

  • Framework readiness scorecard
  • Control gap summary
  • Evidence package status
  • Remediation priority list
  • Auditor response draft
  • Risk exposure by control domain

Mitigate AI says:

"SOC 2 audit readiness: 94% complete. Three controls need attention: MFA enforcement for two privileged accounts, a log retention gap on the staging environment, and a missing vendor risk assessment."

Flat networks let attackers move freely once inside. Critical systems — EMR, POS, OT, financial systems — share the same network fabric as user workstations and guest WiFi. Common issues:

  • No isolation between critical and general-use systems
  • Guest WiFi reachable from POS or clinical networks
  • PCI DSS and HIPAA network segmentation gaps
  • Breach on one system propagates across the environment
  • No visibility into east-west traffic patterns

Maps network topology and enforces segmentation to contain breach blast radius:

  • Network flow analysis & asset mapping
  • High-risk lateral path identification
  • Microsegmentation policy enforcement
  • East-west traffic monitoring & anomaly detection
  • Cross-segment policy violation alerts
Limits breach propagation
Protects critical systems
Supports PCI DSS isolation
Supports HIPAA network controls
Reduces insurance premiums
Improves security architecture

Answers: "Which network paths represent the highest breach propagation risk?"

  • High-risk path inventory
  • Policy violation alerts
  • Segmentation gap analysis
  • Compliance gap mapping
  • Recommended policy changes
  • East-west traffic anomaly report

Mitigate AI says:

"Unauthorized traffic detected from the guest WiFi segment attempting to reach POS terminal POS-12. The connection was blocked per policy. Four similar attempts were recorded this week from different source IPs."

Security teams drown in CVE alerts. Most scanners produce thousands of findings with no context on what actually matters in your specific environment. Common gaps:

  • Thousands of CVEs with no clear prioritization
  • No context on active exploitation in the wild
  • Asset criticality not factored into risk scoring
  • Compensating controls ignored in severity ratings
  • Patch cycles miss the highest-risk vulnerabilities

Correlates CVE data with real-world context to surface what actually needs fixing:

  • CVE & asset inventory correlation
  • Active exploit intelligence feeds
  • Asset criticality & network exposure scoring
  • Compensating control detection
  • Remediation workflow & patch verification
Reduces patching noise
Focuses remediation effort
Lowers actual risk exposure
Prevents active exploits
Improves patch cycle ROI
Reduces attack surface

Answers: "Which vulnerabilities should we patch this week, and in what order?"

  • Top-priority CVE list with rationale
  • Exploit status per vulnerability
  • Asset exposure summary
  • Compensating control inventory
  • Remediation timeline recommendation
  • Risk reduction projection

Mitigate AI says:

"17 critical CVEs were identified in the latest scan. Based on active exploitation intelligence and asset exposure, 3 require immediate action. The remaining 14 have compensating controls or no known active exploits."

  • Missing prior authorizations
  • Incomplete or mismatched documentation
  • Coding mismatches & medical necessity disputes
  • Late charge capture
  • Payer-specific rule errors
  • Human review delays
  • Manual follow-up across disconnected systems

These issues are typically discovered after claim submission — when the cost to fix them is highest.

Connects and normalizes into a governed revenue intelligence layer:

  • Claims & EHR encounter data
  • Prior authorizations & clinical documentation
  • Coding data & payer rules
  • Contract terms & charge capture data
  • Denial history & case management notes
Reduces preventable denials
Improves cash flow
Reduces manual claim review
Improves payer compliance
Accelerates reimbursement
Creates measurable ROI

Helps revenue cycle teams ask: "Which claims are most likely to be denied this week, and why?"

Generates on demand:

  • At-risk claim list
  • Missing documentation checklist
  • Payer-specific denial explanation
  • Coding & documentation mismatch summary
  • Appeal draft
  • Financial exposure estimate
  • Recommended next action by department

ActiveAI says:

"There are 62 encounters at risk for denial, representing approximately $740,000 in potential revenue exposure. The top issue is missing prior authorization documentation for orthopedic procedures under Payer X."

Services delivered are not always properly documented, coded, or billed. Common issues include:

  • Procedures performed but not billed
  • Supplies used but not charged
  • Medication administration mismatches
  • Missing modifiers & inconsistent documentation
  • Duplicate billing risk
  • Late charge entry
  • Department-specific billing variation

Creates both lost revenue and audit exposure.

Compares and reconciles across clinical and billing systems:

  • Orders, procedures & medication administration records
  • Clinical notes & supply usage
  • Charge master data & billing records
  • Departmental workflows & coding rules
  • Payer requirements
Recovers lost revenue
Reduces billing audits
Improves billing accuracy
Reduces compliance risk
Identifies training needs
Improves revenue integrity

Answers: "Where are we missing charges or creating billing risk?"

  • Missing charges
  • Duplicate charge risk
  • Documentation gaps
  • Coding mismatches
  • Department-level & provider-level patterns
  • Recommended correction workflow

ActiveAI says:

"Cardiology has 18 encounters where procedures are documented in the clinical record but no corresponding charge was captured. Estimated missed revenue is $96,000."

Prior authorization failures create delays, denials, rework, and patient dissatisfaction. Hospitals struggle with:

  • Missing or expired authorization
  • Authorization not matching procedure
  • Medical necessity documentation gaps
  • Payer-specific requirements
  • Manual follow-up burden
  • Delayed procedures or billing holds

Connects and identifies authorization risk before the procedure or claim submission:

  • Scheduled procedures & authorization status
  • Payer requirements & patient insurance data
  • Clinical documentation & medical necessity rules
  • Case management notes & procedure codes
  • Denial history
Prevents avoidable denials
Reduces procedure delays
Improves patient experience
Reduces staff rework
Improves payer compliance
Protects pre-service revenue

Answers: "Which scheduled procedures are at risk because of authorization or medical necessity issues?"

  • At-risk procedure list
  • Missing authorization checklist
  • Medical necessity gap summary
  • Payer-specific requirement explanation
  • Staff task list
  • Patient or provider communication draft

ActiveAI says:

"Four procedures scheduled this week do not have valid authorization. Two have authorization for a different CPT code, and one lacks supporting documentation for medical necessity."

Hospitals lose capacity and revenue when patients stay longer than medically necessary. Common causes:

  • Delayed discharge orders
  • Pending labs, imaging, or pharmacy
  • Transport & case management delays
  • Missing placement approvals
  • Incomplete documentation
  • Lack of bed turnover visibility

Every avoidable day creates financial and operational pressure.

Creates a real-time discharge and throughput intelligence layer by unifying:

  • ADT data, bed management & discharge orders
  • Lab, imaging, pharmacy & transport status
  • Case management notes & housekeeping status
  • Staffing levels & patient acuity
  • Expected discharge date
Reduces avoidable LOS
Frees bed capacity
Improves throughput
Reduces ED boarding
Improves revenue per bed
Supports daily huddles

Answers: "Which patients are discharge-ready but still occupying beds, and why?"

  • Discharge barrier list
  • Delay root cause by patient
  • Department responsible
  • Next best action
  • Escalation recommendation
  • Daily discharge huddle summary

ActiveAI says:

"There are 14 patients with discharge delays today. The largest bottleneck is pending skilled nursing placement approval for five patients, followed by pharmacy medication reconciliation delays for four patients."

ED overcrowding creates safety risk, patient dissatisfaction, staff burnout, ambulance diversion, and financial impact. Common causes:

  • No available inpatient beds
  • Delayed discharges
  • Lab and imaging delays
  • Staffing constraints
  • Transport & housekeeping turnover delays
  • Poor visibility across departments

Creates real-time patient flow visibility by connecting:

  • ED registration, triage acuity & ADT data
  • Bed availability & inpatient occupancy
  • Lab & imaging turnaround times
  • Transport & housekeeping status
  • Staffing data & discharge pipeline
Reduces ED boarding
Improves patient experience
Improves throughput
Reduces safety risk
Supports capacity mgmt
Improves operational efficiency

Answers: "What is causing ED boarding right now?"

  • Bottleneck summary
  • Root cause analysis
  • Unit-level capacity risk
  • Suggested escalation
  • Predicted downstream impact
  • Operational command center briefing

ActiveAI says:

"The primary driver of ED boarding is lack of telemetry bed availability. Eleven admitted ED patients are waiting for telemetry placement, while four telemetry discharges are delayed by pending medication reconciliation."

Hospitals spend significant time preparing for audits, accreditation reviews, payer audits, and internal compliance checks. Teams often struggle to find:

  • Required evidence & policy documents
  • Training records & corrective actions
  • Control documentation & incident follow-up
  • Access review evidence
  • Quality measure support

Creates manual burden and compliance risk.

Organizes and governs a compliance evidence layer:

  • Policies & procedures
  • Audit findings & compliance requirements
  • Evidence files & staff training records
  • Incident reports & corrective action plans
  • Access logs & regulatory mappings
Reduces audit prep time
Lowers compliance exposure
Improves documentation quality
Supports regulatory readiness
Reduces evidence collection
Improves governance

Answers: "Are we ready for this audit?"

  • Missing evidence list
  • Control readiness summary
  • Policy gap analysis
  • Corrective action status
  • Audit response draft
  • Compliance risk summary

ActiveAI says:

"Three audit items are incomplete: access review evidence for privileged users, hand hygiene audit documentation for Unit B, and corrective action closure evidence for two safety events."

Incomplete or inconsistent documentation creates risk across billing, compliance, quality reporting, and patient care. Common issues include:

  • Missing diagnosis support
  • Conflicting notes & incomplete physician documentation
  • Poor medical necessity support
  • Quality measure documentation gaps
  • Inconsistent discharge summaries
  • Documentation not supporting billed services

Creates a documentation integrity layer by connecting:

  • Clinical notes, diagnoses & orders
  • Lab results, imaging & procedures
  • Billing codes & quality measures
  • Payer requirements & prior documentation patterns
Reduces billing mistakes
Improves coding accuracy
Reduces audit risk
Improves documentation quality
Supports CDI teams
Protects reimbursement

Reviews documentation and answers: "Which encounters have documentation risk?"

  • Missing clinical support
  • Conflicting documentation
  • Coding support gaps
  • Medical necessity gaps
  • Quality measure documentation issues
  • Recommended clarification requests

ActiveAI says:

"This encounter includes a billed diagnosis of acute respiratory failure, but the supporting documentation does not include oxygen saturation, respiratory distress indicators, or physician confirmation."

Hospitals face serious compliance and security risk when users have inappropriate access to PHI or sensitive systems. Issues include:

  • Excessive access privileges
  • Former employees with active access
  • Inappropriate patient record access
  • Shared accounts & privileged access not reviewed
  • Department transfers not reflected in permissions
  • Lack of audit-ready evidence

Creates a governed access intelligence layer by connecting:

  • Identity & HR systems
  • EHR access logs & role definitions
  • Department assignments & termination records
  • Access review records & security events
  • Compliance policies
Reduces PHI exposure risk
Supports HIPAA compliance
Improves access governance
Reduces audit findings
Strengthens security posture
Protects patient trust

Answers: "Where do we have inappropriate access risk?"

  • Access exception list
  • Privileged user review
  • Terminated user access warning
  • Suspicious PHI access summary
  • Department mismatch detection
  • Audit-ready access review report

ActiveAI says:

"Seven users retain elevated access inconsistent with their current department. Two terminated users still appear in downstream application access records."

Hospitals often overspend due to poor visibility into vendor contracts, supply utilization, pricing variance, and expiring agreements. Common issues include:

  • Contract pricing not followed
  • Supply waste & duplicate vendors
  • Unused service agreements
  • Expiring contracts & manual vendor review
  • Lack of spend visibility by department

Creates a spend and contract intelligence layer by connecting:

  • Vendor contracts & purchase orders
  • Invoices & supply chain systems
  • Department usage & inventory data
  • Contract terms, budget records & renewal dates
Reduces supply chain waste
Improves contract compliance
Identifies savings opportunities
Reduces manual spend analysis
Supports procurement governance
Improves financial control

Answers: "Where are we overspending or leaking value from vendor contracts?"

  • Contract mismatch summary
  • Expiring agreement alerts
  • Pricing variance report
  • Duplicate vendor identification
  • Supply utilization patterns
  • Savings recommendations

ActiveAI says:

"Three departments are purchasing supplies outside the negotiated contract rate, creating an estimated $118,000 in annualized overspend."

Hospitals collect safety and quality data but often struggle to identify patterns early enough to intervene. Issues include:

  • Patient falls & medication errors
  • Infection control trends
  • Staff safety incidents
  • Delayed incident closure
  • Inconsistent corrective action
  • Manual quality reporting

Creates a quality and safety intelligence layer by connecting:

  • Safety events & incident management systems
  • Quality measures & infection control data
  • Staffing levels, unit census & patient acuity
  • Training records & corrective actions
  • Patient complaints
Improves patient safety
Reduces adverse events
Supports quality teams
Improves regulatory readiness
Reduces risk exposure
Identifies preventable trends

Answers: "What safety trends need immediate attention?"

  • Incident trend summary
  • Root cause indicators
  • Unit-level risk analysis
  • Corrective action recommendations
  • Regulatory readiness summary
  • Leadership briefing

ActiveAI says:

"Falls increased 22% on Unit C over the last 30 days. The increase correlates with higher patient acuity, lower night-shift staffing, and delayed completion of fall-risk reassessments."

Emergencies move faster than phone trees, radios, email, and one-way mass alerts. The real value is not just sending a message — it is targeting the right audience, confirming receipt, opening a secure response channel, and tracking action through resolution. Common gaps:

  • No targeted segmentation by building, group, role, or roster
  • One-way mass alerts with no receipt confirmation
  • No secure two-way response channel
  • No accountability tracking through resolution
  • Reliance on disconnected PA, radio, email, and phone systems

Sends targeted emergency communications to the exact people who need to act — by campus, building, grade, group, role, bus route, or visitor cohort — and opens a secure mission channel for response teams.

  • K–12: school, building, grade, classroom, bus route, staff group, parent group, SRO, nurse, transportation, facilities, superintendent cabinet, local EMS
  • Higher Ed: campus, residence hall, floor, department, athletic team, lab, event venue, student group, campus police, EMTs/EMS
  • Situations: weather warning, evacuation, medical emergency, gas leak, missing student, bus incident, active threat, campus closure
Move from one-way alerts to coordinated engagement
Reach the right people instantly
Confirm receipt and escalate non-responses
Open secure two-way mission channels
Preserve a complete incident record
Eliminate phone trees and radio chaos
LocateIdentify affected campus, building, zone, group, roster, visitor population, or response team.
EngageSend targeted alerts and open a secure mission channel for administrators, EMTs/EMS, public safety, facilities, communications, and leadership.
MitigateLaunch the right playbook, assign tasks, track acknowledgments, escalate non-responses, and preserve a complete incident record.

Engage AI says:

"Weather alert issued for Building C and the east athletic fields. 147 of 152 staff acknowledged. 5 remain unreachable. Two student groups are still in the outdoor area — coaches have been notified and are routing students to shelter."

Schools and campuses need to coordinate administrators, public safety, teachers, staff, EMTs/EMS, families, and communications teams without exposing sensitive information or creating confusion. CISA guidance emphasizes layered security, communications equipment, and coordinated response protocols. Common gaps:

  • No single coordinated platform for all response roles
  • Radio and phone channels flood during a crisis
  • Sensitive information exposed in mass messages
  • No accountability or status tracking by room or zone
  • No documented communication record for after-action review

Creates secure communication channels for each response role with appropriate access levels — preventing both communication chaos and information exposure.

  • K–12: administrators, SROs, law enforcement liaisons, EMTs/EMS, transportation, district leadership, family communications
  • Higher Ed: campus police, local law enforcement, EMS, emergency management, facilities, residence life, student affairs, executive leadership
  • Tracks lockdown activation, room status, unresolved areas, parent notification timing, and recovery tasks
Eliminate communication chaos in first minutes
Protect sensitive info from mass exposure
Confirm room and zone status in real time
Coordinate all roles without flooding phone lines
Create complete incident documentation
Enable faster post-event recovery
LocateThreat location, affected buildings, nearby groups, visitors, responders, and critical safety resources.
EngageSecure channels for campus command, EMTs/EMS, administrators, public safety, families, and communications teams.
MitigateLockdown/shelter playbook, task tracking, acknowledgment, escalation, documentation, and after-action improvement.

Engage AI says:

"Lockdown initiated for North Building at 2:14 PM. All administrators confirmed. Law enforcement liaison notified. 6 classrooms have not yet confirmed secure status — escalation messages sent to building captains."

Weather is frequent, urgent, and operationally disruptive. Tornadoes, flooding, wildfire smoke, winter storms, and heat events affect transportation, athletics, residence halls, outdoor events, and special-needs support simultaneously. Common gaps:

  • One alert goes to everyone regardless of operational role
  • Transportation and athletics receive the same message as administrators
  • No way to track shelter-in-place status by building or group
  • Early dismissal and bus changes managed separately from communications
  • Post-event facility checks and follow-up untracked

Sends different messages to different groups based on role and operational function — administrators, teachers, transportation, coaches, parents, after-school staff, and local EMS — simultaneously and with tracking.

  • K–12: administrators, teachers, transportation, coaches, parents, after-school staff, local EMS — simultaneously with tracking
  • Higher Ed: campus police, emergency management, EMTs/EMS, residence life, faculty, facilities, student affairs, communications
  • Tracks shelter-in-place status, early dismissal decisions, transportation changes, and parent questions
Coordinate transportation, facilities, and families simultaneously
Track shelter-in-place status by building
Manage early dismissal with confirmation
Reach residence halls and events separately
Close the loop on open parent questions
Reduce post-event operational confusion
LocateWeather impact zones, buildings, outdoor spaces, buses, events, residence halls, and at-risk groups.
EngageTargeted messages by campus, group, role, location, and operational function.
MitigateShelter, evacuation, closure, transportation, and recovery playbooks.

Engage AI says:

"Tornado warning in effect. Shelter-in-place confirmed at 4 of 6 schools. Bus routes 12 and 17 have been rerouted. Athletic events at the south complex are being cleared. 43 parents have submitted early pickup requests — dismissal team notified."

Visitor management is both a daily operational need and an emergency response need. CISA K–12 guidance notes that electronic visitor management helps schools maintain records of who enters buildings and reduces unauthorized visitor risk. Common gaps:

  • Visitor logs exist only for front-desk use, not emergency response
  • No link between visitor check-in and emergency notification
  • Host staff not automatically notified when a visitor is overdue or unaccounted for
  • No targeted alerting capability for visitor cohorts during an emergency
  • Visitor data not accessible to safety teams in real time

Connects visitor identity, host, check-in location, destination, and event affiliation to emergency communications — so safety teams can notify visitors, guide them, and account for them the same way they account for staff and students.

  • K–12: parents, volunteers, substitutes, contractors, delivery personnel, vendors, event visitors
  • Higher Ed: contractors, visiting researchers, prospective families, event guests, athletic visitors, vendors, donors, clinical visitors, conference attendees
  • In any emergency: know who is checked in, where they are, who their host is, and whether they are accounted for
Visitor records become part of emergency readiness
Alert and account for all campus occupants
Hosts automatically notified of visitor status
Reduce unauthorized access incidents
Complete visitor documentation for after-action
Move beyond front-desk-only visitor management
LocateVisitor identity, host, check-in location, destination, event affiliation, and check-out status.
EngageNotify visitors, hosts, front desk teams, campus safety, administrators, and event teams.
MitigateEscalate overdue visitors, unauthorized presence, restricted access concerns, evacuation accountability, and incident documentation.

Engage AI says:

"Building evacuation initiated. 14 visitors are currently checked in. 11 have been notified via mobile alert. 3 are in restricted zones — their hosts have been contacted and facilities staff has been deployed."

Federal REMS guidance requires emergency plans to address access and functional needs throughout communications, evacuation, shelter-in-place, lockdown, accounting for all persons, and reunification. In practice this requires specific information, specific people, and secure coordination. Common gaps:

  • No secure, need-to-know communication channel for support staff
  • Sensitive student information shared broadly instead of with the right people only
  • No accountability tracking for students requiring evacuation assistance
  • Medication and medical needs not surfaced to the right responders
  • After-action documentation incomplete for compliance review

Securely coordinates the right support staff without exposing sensitive information to a broad audience.

  • K–12: teachers, special education staff, nurses, counselors, administrators, transportation, guardians, and EMS
  • Higher Ed: accessibility services, residence life, campus safety, EMTs/EMS, faculty, event teams, and facilities
  • Covers mobility, sensory, medical, communication, behavioral, cognitive, and language-access needs
Protect vulnerable students in every emergency
Coordinate support without broad info exposure
Track evacuation assistance and unresolved needs
Satisfy IDEA, REMS, and ADA emergency planning
Preserve complete compliance documentation
Improve plan quality after every drill and event
LocateAuthorized, need-to-know view of support needs, safe locations, assigned helpers, and affected zones.
EngageSecure communication with the right support team, not broad exposure of sensitive information.
MitigateAssistance tasks, unresolved support needs, follow-up care, plan improvements, and documentation.

Engage AI says:

"Evacuation in progress. 4 students with mobility support needs are in the east wing. Their assigned helpers have been notified. Nurse has confirmed medication kits are secured. 1 student in Room 112 has not been accounted for — building captain is responding."

Many emergency platforms stop at people and messages. Education institutions also need to know the location and status of critical assets: emergency equipment, AEDs, radios, buses, lab equipment, IT assets, and facility systems. Higher Ed guidance specifically notes campuses include research labs, medical care, athletic complexes, residential systems, sensitive materials, and critical infrastructure. Common gaps:

  • Emergency equipment location unknown during an incident
  • No link between asset status and response coordination
  • IT devices, research equipment, and specialty assets untracked during events
  • Facilities teams operating without equipment risk visibility
  • No chain-of-custody documentation after an incident

Notifies the right people when assets enter a risk area, go offline, or require a response action.

  • K–12: emergency radios, AEDs, stop-the-bleed kits, cameras, access-control devices, Chromebooks, buses, nurse-office assets, maintenance tools, facility systems
  • Higher Ed: research equipment, lab assets, cold storage, chemical storage, medical equipment, access-control systems, generators, IT devices, art collections, emergency call boxes
Know where emergency equipment is before you need it
Notify the right people when assets are at risk
Track asset status through an incident
Preserve chain-of-custody documentation
Reduce capital loss and replacement costs
Strengthen post-event insurance and compliance records
LocateAsset location, owner, operational status, risk area, and dependency.
EngageNotify asset owners, IT, facilities, public safety, lab managers, athletics, or administrators.
MitigateCreate repair, recovery, replacement, chain-of-custody, incident, or remediation tasks.

Engage AI says:

"Power outage reported in the science wing. 3 research freezers, 2 AEDs, and the emergency generator are in the affected zone. Lab managers and facilities have been notified. Generator status check requested."

For K–12, reunification is one of the highest-stress operational moments after an evacuation, active threat, weather event, bus disruption, or building closure. Clery guidance also requires institutions with on-campus housing to maintain missing student notification policies. Spreadsheets, radios, and phone trees cannot manage accountability, custody exceptions, parent communication, and escalation simultaneously. Common gaps:

  • No real-time student accountability during an evacuation
  • Reunification site communication managed by radio and phone
  • Custody exceptions and guardian restrictions not surfaced to release staff
  • Parents notified too late or with incomplete information
  • No documentation of student release and unresolved cases

Sends staged communications to parents, guardians, transportation, administrators, law enforcement, and reunification teams — with tracking for student release, unresolved cases, and exception handling.

  • K–12: student groups, staff assignments, bus locations, reunification zones, guardians, custody exceptions, and unaccounted-for students
  • Higher Ed: residence hall evacuation, missing student protocols, field trip disruptions, travel group accountability, and Clery-required notifications
Replace spreadsheets and phone trees with tracked workflow
Confirm student status in real time
Surface custody exceptions to release staff
Communicate with families accurately and on schedule
Document all release and escalation decisions
Reduce liability and compliance risk after an event
LocateStudent roster, staff assignment, group location, safe/unknown status, release site, and exception cases.
EngageSecure communication with families, guardians, administrators, responders, and student affairs teams.
MitigateReunification workflow, missing-person escalation, exception handling, documentation, and after-action review.

Engage AI says:

"Reunification in progress at the community center. 312 of 329 students accounted for. 17 remain outstanding — 14 are confirmed with guardians, 3 are still unresolved. Custody exception flags are active for 4 students in the release queue."

Campus events bring visitors, vendors, temporary staff, EMTs/EMS, security, transportation, administrators, and communications teams into one operating environment. The Department of Education's Clery guidance specifically calls attention to campus safety responsibilities around protests, demonstrations, and other events. Common gaps:

  • No unified event command channel across all operational roles
  • Visitor and vendor flows not linked to campus safety systems
  • Medical, security, and incident response handled across separate channels
  • No structured escalation path for event incidents
  • Post-event documentation and lessons learned not captured

Creates a secure event command channel by role, group, and location — coordinating all operational roles from a single platform.

  • K–12: graduation, football games, board meetings, concerts, community events — administrators, event staff, security, EMS, transportation, facilities, families
  • Higher Ed: football games, commencement, protests, concerts, speaker events, festivals, donor events, conferences — event command, campus police, EMTs/EMS, facilities, student affairs, communications, external partners
Replace radio chaos with structured event command
Coordinate all event roles from one platform
Track and escalate incidents in real time
Account for visitors, vendors, and temporary staff
Preserve complete event documentation
Strengthen post-event compliance and improvement
LocateEvent zones, visitor groups, staff posts, EMS resources, assets, and nearby campus impacts.
EngageSecure event command channel by role, group, and location.
MitigateEvent safety playbook, incident tasks, documentation, and after-action reporting.

Engage AI says:

"Commencement underway. Medical alert: one guest is down in section C. EMS team notified and responding. 14,000 visitors are currently on campus. Facilities has confirmed all emergency exits are clear. Security is holding the north gate until the response is complete."

IoT Predictive Maintenance

Facilities teams use Active Guard to monitor HVAC systems, medical devices, and production equipment continuously. Anomaly detection flags developing failures days before they cause downtime, and a performance guarantee protects every monitored asset.

Elevator & Equipment Monitoring

Building operators and dealer groups use Active Guard to track vibration, temperature, and operational cycle data from elevators, lifts, and diagnostic equipment in real time — resolving the majority of issues before they result in service calls or guest impact.

Facility-Wide Asset Intelligence

Large campuses and multi-building operators use Active Guard to build a live asset register across every monitored device — correlating performance trends, warranty status, and maintenance history into a single operations dashboard that removes the guesswork from capital planning.

See how Our Solutions map to your environment
Every deployment is different. Talk to our team and we will walk through the exact use cases that apply to your industry and stack.

Let's Talk.

Have questions about the platform or want to understand which products fit your environment? Reach out directly — our team responds same day.

214-206-9266
sales@coreplus.net
Dallas, TX · 24/7 US SOC · North America Operations